Scope
The institution, workflow, participant group, and implementation period are described.
Evidence programme
Evidence before endorsement.
Institutional outcomes should be specific, permissioned, and reproducible enough to inform a decision—not polished into a universal promise.
Current evidence state
No public outcome case study is being presented as verified evidence yet.
This page will not turn unverified testimonials, partner logos, sample dashboards, or internal estimates into institutional proof. Pilot outcomes will be added only after the publication gate below is satisfied.
Publication gate
What must be true before a story is public.
A useful case study makes the evaluation boundaries visible so another institution can decide what is relevant to its own context.
Baseline
The prior process and comparison method are documented before outcomes are interpreted.
Measures
Definitions, collection method, sample limits, and known confounders are stated.
Permission
Names, logos, quotes, and results have explicit written publication approval.
Limitations
Exceptions, unresolved questions, and conditions that may not generalise are included.
Evidence questions
- Does AI Sentinels have published customer case studies?
- Not yet. No public outcome case study is being presented as verified evidence at this stage. Institutional results are only published once they clear a defined gate covering scope, baseline, measures, permission, and limitations.
- What has to be true before a case study is published?
- Five things. The institution, workflow, participant group, and implementation period are described. The prior process and comparison method are documented before outcomes are interpreted. Definitions, collection method, sample limits, and known confounders are stated. Names, logos, quotes, and results carry explicit written approval. Exceptions, unresolved questions, and conditions that may not generalise are included.
- How can our institution produce its own evidence?
- Begin with a governed pilot and an agreed baseline. The prior process and the comparison method are documented before outcomes are interpreted, which is what makes a result interpretable rather than just favourable.
Create decision-grade evidence